Analisis Dan Desain Dinamis Pondasi Dangkal Berdasarkan Data CPT
I will put the dimension here
Abstract
A generator set used at the building has to consider some environmental factors so that it would not affect the building structure system and not cause some noises as long as operation time. In order to avoid these disturbances, all foundation systems are not only analyzed and designed in the static calculation but also they must consider some impact factors due to dynamic loading. This study's purpose is to determine the dimensions of shallow foundation and specifications of rubber as a vibration damper in accordance with applicable regulations. The static calculation analyzes the immediate and consolidation settlements, and bearing capacity that occurred at the soil foundation using the Schmertmann method. The dynamic analysis calculates some magnitudes of frequency and or amplitude, and also attenuation of single and couple mode vibration in vertical, horizontal, longitudinal displacement directions, then also rocking, yawing, and pitching turning moment directions using the Lumped Parameter method from some references. Analysis and design obtained the dimensions of 3.7 x 1.7 x 0.7 m for shallow foundation system and allowable bearing capacity (qall) indicated equals 4.10 kg/cm2 based on static condition, and 6.20 kg/cm2 according to static and dynamic conditions, respectively. Then, some assessments in static and dynamic calculations were also found the total settlement (D) = 0.49 mm, amplitude (Az) = 6.6 x 10-6 m, (Ax) = 3.2 x 10-6 m, and (Af) = 1.7 x 10-6 rad. Generally, the resulting parameters from those analyses and design have fulfilled the existing standard and local government regulations.
References
Anastasopoulos I, Kontoroupi T. 2014. Simplified approximate method for analysis of rocking systems accounting for soil inelasticity and foundation uplifting. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2014;56:28–43.
Blake, M.P. 1964. New Vibration Standards for Maintenance. Hydrocarbon Processing Petroleum Refiner,Vol.43 , No.1, pp 111-114.
Baxter, R.L., Bernhard, D.L., 1967. Vibration Tolerances for Industry, in: ASME Paper 67-PEM-14, Plant Engineering and MaintenanceEngineer. Detroit, Michigan.
Beredugo, Y.O. and Novak, M. 1972. Coupled horizontal and rocking vibration of embedded footings. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 9(4): pp. 477-497.
Braja, M.D. 2011, "Principles of Foundation Engineering, SI", 7th edition, Global Engineering: Christopher M. Shortt.
Bowles, J.E. 1977. Foundation Analysis and Design. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. International Edition.
El Ganainy, H, El Naggar M.H. 2009. Efficient 3D nonlinear Winkler model for shallow foundations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2009;29:123648.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.02.002.
Febrianto. 2011. Perencanaan dan Pelaksanaan Pondasi Mesin Generator PT EPFM [Skripsi]. Makasar: Fakultas Teknik Universitas Hasanuddin.
Hardiyatmo, H., C. 2011. Analisa dan Perancangan Fondasi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Irsyam, M, Sahadewa A, dan Darjanto H. 2008. Dinamika tanah dan Fondasi Mesin. Bandung: ITB.
Janbu, N., Bjerrum, L., and Kjaernsli B. 1956. Veiledning ved losning av fundamenteringsoppgaver. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Publication No. 16, 93 p. (in Norwegian).
KepMen Negara KLH. 1996. No.: KEP-49/MENLH/11/1996. Tentang Baku Tingkat Getaran.
Kutter BL, Moore M, Hakhamaneshi M, Champion C. 2016, Rationale for shallow foundation rocking provisions in ASCE 41-13. Earthq Spectra 32, pp. :1097–119.http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/121914EQS215M.
Karman rubber vibro-insulator. 2018. Karman Rubber Company. 2331 Copley Road Akron, OH 44320. USA
Prakash, S. and Puri, V.K. 1988. Foundation for Machines Analysis and Design. John Wiley &Sons, New York.
Richart, F. E. 1962. Foundation vibrations. Trans. ASCE, 111, pp. 863-898.
Rocscience Inc. 2016. RS2– 2D finite element program for soil and rock applications.
Robertson, P.K., and Campanella, R.G. 1986a. Interpretation of cone penetration tests – Part I (sand). Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 20(4): 718-733.
Skempton, A.W and Mac Donald, W.H. 1956. Allowable Settlement of Building. Proceeding Institute of Civil Engineers, Part III, Vol. 5, pp. 727 – 768.
Robertson, P.K., and Campanella, R.G. 1986b. Interpretation of cone penetration tests – Part II (clay). Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 20(4): 734-745.
Robertson, P.K. 2010. Interpretation of cone penetration tests – a unified approach, Canadian Geotech. J., 46(11):1337–1355.
Sigit, A.S. 1996. Buku Ajar Pondasi Dinamis. Surabaya: ITS.
Schneider, J.A., Randolph, M.F., Mayne, P.W., and Ramsey, N. 2008. Analysis of Factors Influencing Soil Classification Using Normalized Piezocone Tip Resistance and Pore Pressure Parameters. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134(11), pp: 1569-1586.
Schmertmann, J. H. 1978. Guidelines for cone penetration test, performance and design U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, Report No. FHWA-TS-78-209, 145 p.
SNI 1726. 2012. Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan non gedung. Badan Standardisasi Nasional. ICS 91.120.25;91.080.01.
Specification of Triton Generating Set. 2018. www.gopwer.com
Wayne, C.T. 1992. Foundation Design. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, M-97 Connaught Circus, New Delhi-110001.
Zhang J, Tang Y. 2007. Finite element modeling of shallow foundations on nonlinear soil medium. Struct., Los Angeles.
Copyright (c) 2020 Putera Agung Maha Agung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
