Penilaian Efisiensi Aplikasi MPDM Calculator Dalam Pengukuran Produktivitas Method Productivity Delay Model

Redityo Januardi; Julian Pramudhita Dewangga; Muhammad Syaiful Aliim

doi:10.52158/jaceit.v6i1.1041

Redityo Januardi Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Julian Pramudhita Dewangga Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Muhammad Syaiful Aliim Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52158/jaceit.v6i1.1041
I will put the dimension here

Keywords: Construction Productivity Measurement, MPDM, Android Application, Efficiency, Project Control

Abstract

Technology can assist human needs in various sectors, including the construction sector. Its application has the opportunity to increase technical practicality, time, and cost efficiency, help speed up decision-making, and reduce the risk of errors. One challenge in construction implementation is the inadequate measurement of labor productivity and the lack of well-documented root causes, which can lead to delayed performance improvement decisions and incorrect conclusions. One effective method for productivity analysis is the MPDM (Method Productivity Delay Model), which can measure, predict, and improve productivity by identifying factors that cause delays. Currently, efforts have been made to digitalize part of the productivity measurement process of the MPDM method under the name MPDM Calculator Version 1.0. This application can be used for the data collection and processing stages of the MPDM method productivity calculation and is considered effective based on the same results as conventional methods. This study aims to determine and assess the efficiency of using the application in the process of calculating the productivity of the MPDM method. The results show that this application shortens the productivity measurement process significantly, where the test results for 2 case studies, obtained efficiency values of 153.2% and 156.1%. This application has the potential to be developed again in the process of analyzing productivity and recommending performance improvements to increase productivity. It is hoped that this application can answer the problem of using the MPDM method as one of the construction project control instruments.

References

H. Begić, M. Galić, and Z. Dolaček-Alduk, “Digitalization and automation in construction project’s life-cycle: a review.,” Journal of information technology in construction, vol. 27, 2022.

A. Jensson, “Digitalization in the construction industry,” 2017.

I. Hermawan and S. Sudirman, “Digitalization of The Construction Industry with BIM and 3D Machine Control Integration for Construction Performance Improvement.,” Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 185–203, 2023.

Y. Arianto, S. Darsono, and B. Zaman, “Pengelolaan Digitalisasi Konstruksi Sumber Daya Manusia Di PT. Adhi Karya (Persero) Tbk Departemen Gedung,” Jurnal Profesi Insinyur Indonesia, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 119–124, 2023.

X. Ren, Z. Zhu, C. Germain, R. Belair, and Z. Chen, “Automated monitoring of the utilization rate of onsite construction equipment,” in Computing in Civil Engineering 2017, 2017, pp. 74–81.

A. Rathnayake and C. Middleton, “Systematic review of the literature on construction productivity,” J Constr Eng Manag, vol. 149, no. 6, p. 03123005, 2023.

R. V. Martono, Analisis Produktivitas dan efisiensi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2019.

R. Januardi, P. S. Nugroho, B. Mulyono, and M. Viqolbi, “The effectiveness of construction operation performance measurement techniques and the challenges of application in preventing delays in construction projects,” in MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 2024, p. 04002.

R. Syarif, “Manajemen Produktivitas,” 1991, Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.

S. P. Dozzi and S. M. AbouRizk, Productivity in construction. Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council Ottawa, 1993.

C.-K. Chang and W. S. Yoo, “A Case study on productivity analysis and methods improvement for masonry work,” Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 372–381, 2013.

J. P. Dewangga, “Studi Inisiasi Penggunaan Metode Pengukuran Produktivitas Method Productivity Delay Model Berbasis Mobile Application,” Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwolerto, 2023.

MIT, “MIT App Inventor,” 2024. Accessed: Jul. 22, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://appinventor.mit.edu/about-us

L. L. Lionggono, A. Saharuddin, D. H. D. Hartanto, and H. Leong, “Pemodelan Rodit Untuk Menghitung Gaya Lateral Pada Pondasi Tiang Pancang Ujung Bebas Pada Tanah Kohesif Menggunakan Metode Brom’s Berbasis Mit App Inventor,” G-SMART, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 66–80, 2023, doi: 10.24167/gsmart.v7i1.10252.

M. A. Aziz, R. Januardi, and M. S. Aliim, “Efisiensi Penggunaan CBC Calculator sebagai Alat Bantu Pengukuran Produktivitas Metode Crew Balance Chart,” Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management (JIPM), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 125–138, 2024.

D. W. Halpin and L. S. Riggs, Planning and Analysis of Construction Operations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.

C. G. Putri and S. Santoso, “Analisis Transformasi Digitalisasi Melalui Aplikasi Sistem Integrasi Konstruksi Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Quantity Surveyor Proyek Konstruksi Bangunan Gedung,” Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 459559, 2020.

H. A. Abdelkhalek, H. S. Refaie, and R. F. Aziz, “Optimization of time and cost through learning curve analysis,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1069–1082, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2019.12.007.