SLR Systematic Literature Review: Metode Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menggunakan Human Performance Technology
I will put the dimension here
Abstract
Performance appraisal is an activity conducted by groups or individuals in a company with the aim of evaluating employee performance based on specific indicators. The purpose of this evaluation is to determine the level of employee performance, provide fair job opportunities, and enhance employee motivation and performance. The objective of this research is to review the literature that employs the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, while considering several aspects such as previous research on employee performance appraisal and human performance technology. Initially, the search was limited to 450 journals. Then, a review and further screening were conducted, resulting in 161 remaining journals using inclusion and exclusion criteria, yielding 17 journals that met the requirements. This research was conducted over several years to assess employee performance. Therefore, this systematic literature review is carried out to identify the methods used for employee performance appraisal and mentions that optimization algorithms and fuzzy comprehensive methods are used as evaluation methods to assess performance appraisal methods.
Downloads
References
N. Sari and E. Mardalena, “Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan dengan Menggunakan Metode Behaviorally Anchor Rating Scale,” Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Unbara, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 36–46, 2021.
P. V. Jeseni and V. Mahesh, “PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF EMPLOYEES IN TEXTILE INDUSTRIES IN KOZHIKODE,” J Pharm Negat Results, vol. 13, pp. 1905–1910, 2022, doi: 10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S08.230.
T. T. Selvarajan, B. Singh, and S. Solansky, “Performance appraisal fairness, leader member exchange and motivation to improve performance: A study of US and Mexican employees,” J Bus Res, vol. 85, pp. 142–154, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.043.
J. Afriany and S. Hafni Sahir, “Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Information Science (SENARIS) Efektifitas Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Dalam Peningkatan Motivasi Kerja Menerapkan Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” 2019.
Y. Rivaldo and S. D. Nabella, “Employee Performance: Education, Training, Experience and Work Discipline,” Quality - Access to Success, vol. 24, no. 193, pp. 182–188, 2023, doi: 10.47750/QAS/24.193.20.
J. W. Kihama and L. Wainaina, “Performance appraisal feedback and employee productivity in water and sewarage companies in Kiambu County, Kenya,” International Academic Journal of Human Resource and Business Administration, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 376–393, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://www.iajournals.org/articles/iajhrba_v3_i5_376_393.pdf
S. S. Kamble, A. Gunasekaran, A. Ghadge, and R. Raut, “A performance measurement system for industry 4.0 enabled smart manufacturing system in SMMEs- A review and empirical investigation,” Int J Prod Econ, vol. 229, p. 107853, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107853.
O. Maharani and I. Rindaningsih, “MAMEN (Jurnal Manajemen) Penilaian Kinerja Sebagai Penentu Prestasi dan Kinerja Tenaga Kependidikan: Literature Review,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 159–170, 2023, doi: 10.55123/mamen.v2i1.1626.
H. Islam and N. K. Sarker, “The Effect of Management by Objectives on Performance Appraisal and Employee Satisfaction in Commercial Banks,” European Journal of Business and Management, no. July, 2020, doi: 10.7176/ejbm/12-20-02.
M. B. Gilbert, “Human Performance Technology: Further Reflections on Human Competence,” J Organ Behav Manage, vol. 39, no. 1–2, pp. 7–112, 2019, doi: 10.1080/01608061.2019.1596864.
Nia Budi Puspitasari, Nabila Aurellia Ramadhani, and Zainal Fanani Rosyada, “Preparation of employee performance assessment with a combination of management by objective and behaviorally anchor rating scale,” World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 296–306, 2023, doi: 10.30574/wjaets.2023.9.1.0174.
R. Permana and Z. F. Ikatrinasari, “Designing of Performance Management System for Auditor Certification Body Using Management By Objective and Behaviorally Anchor Rating Scale,” Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 179–186, 2020, doi: 10.24874/PES02.02.008.
M. Bagheri et al., “Land-use suitability assessment using delphi and analytical hierarchy process (D-ahp) hybrid model for coastal city management: Kuala terengganu, peninsular malaysia,” ISPRS Int J Geoinf, vol. 10, no. 9, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijgi10090621.
M. Alfagih and I. Kariri, “A Proposal to Develop the Performance of School Leaders in Saudi Arabia in the Light of Human Performance Technology (HPT),” Information Sciences Letters, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 2053–2092, 2022, doi: 10.18576/isl/110618.
J. Stefaniak, “The Utility of Design Thinking to Promote Systemic Instructional Design Practices in the Workplace,” TechTrends, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 202–210, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11528-019-00453-8.
E. K. Osam and K. Nold, “A Case Study on the Application of a Human Performance Technology Model to a Sports Product Manufacturing Company,” Performance Improvement, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 17–25, 2020, doi: 10.1002/pfi.21916.
L. Latifah and N. Ngalimun, “PEMULIHAN PENDIDIKAN PASCA PANDEMI MELALUI TRANSFORMASI DIGITAL DENGAN PENDEKATAN MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM DI ERA SOCIETY 5.0,” Jurnal Terapung : Ilmu - Ilmu Sosial, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 41, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.31602/jt.v5i1.10576.
E. R. Rahmi, E. Yumami, and N. Hidayasari, “Analisis Metode Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Berbasis Website: Systematic Literature Review,” remik, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 821–834, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.33395/remik.v7i1.12177.
Nursalam et al., PEDOMAN PENYUSUNAN LITERATURE DAN SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. 2020.
R. van Dinter, B. Tekinerdogan, and C. Catal, “Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review,” Inf Softw Technol, vol. 136, no. October 2020, p. 106589, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106589.
D. Agusantia and D. Juandi, “Kemampuan Penalaran Analogi Matematis di Indonesia: Systematic Literature Review,” Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 222–231, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.23969/symmetry.v7i2.6436.
J. Paul and A. R. Criado, “The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?,” International Business Review, vol. 29, no. 4, p. 101717, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717.
J. Ast, R. Wasseghi, and P. Nyhuis, “A comparison of methods for determining performance based employee deployment in production systems,” Production Engineering, vol. 15, no. 3–4, pp. 335–342, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11740-021-01019-5.
T. T. Selvarajan, B. Singh, and S. Solansky, “Performance appraisal fairness, leader member exchange and motivation to improve performance: A study of US and Mexican employees,” J Bus Res, vol. 85, pp. 142–154, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.043.
M. B. Gilbert, “Human Performance Technology: Further Reflections on Human Competence,” Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, vol. 39, no. 1–2. Routledge, pp. 7–112, Apr. 03, 2019. doi: 10.1080/01608061.2019.1596864.
S. Popaitoon, “The moderating effects of job design on human capital and NPD performance: Evidence from high-technology MNCs in Thailand,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 40–57, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/APJBA-01-2019-0017.
Z. Wang, S. Ren, and L. Meng, “High-performance work systems and thriving at work: the role of cognitive appraisal and servant leadership,” Personnel Review, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1749–1771, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1108/PR-10-2019-0561.
D. N. Utama and E. Rustamaji, “Fuzzy Decision Support Model for Human Resources Performance Appraisal,” in Proceedings of 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, ICIMTech 2018, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Nov. 2018, pp. 272–276. doi: 10.1109/ICIMTech.2018.8528145.
P. Lin, “Research on Enterprise Employee Performance Appraisal Management System Based on CS Architecture,” Security and Communication Networks, vol. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/9087094.
J. Peng, “Performance Appraisal System and Its Optimization Method for Enterprise Management Employees Based on the KPI Index,” Discrete Dyn Nat Soc, vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/1937083.
Y. Qian and J. Yin, “Study on Employee Performance Evaluation Based on Adaptive Feature Selection Fuzzy Algorithm,” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/6985508.
A. Ijadi Maghsoodi, G. Abouhamzeh, M. Khalilzadeh, and E. K. Zavadskas, “Ranking and selecting the best performance appraisal method using the MULTIMOORA approach integrated Shannon’s entropy,” Frontiers of Business Research in China, vol. 12, no. 1, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1186/s11782-017-0022-6.
L. Yan, L. Wang, X. Shen, P. Li, and J. Guo, “The Effect of Transformational Change on Performance: An Employee’s Stress Appraisals Perspective,” Front Psychol, vol. 13, May 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897769.
M. J. J. Gumasing and F. M. F. Castro, “Determining Ergonomic Appraisal Factors Affecting the Learning Motivation and Academic Performance of Students during Online Classes,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 3, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15031970.
B. Chahar, “Performance appraisal systems and their impact on employee performance: The moderating role of employee motivation,” Information Resources Management Journal, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 17–32, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.4018/IRMJ.2020100102.
Y. Yi, “Application of an Improved Clustering Algorithm of Neural Networks in Performance Appraisal Systems,” Journal of Cases on Information Technology, vol. 24, no. 5, 2022, doi: 10.4018/JCIT.304385.
A. Aydın and S. Tiryaki, “Impact of performance appraisal on employee motivation and productivity in turkish forest products industry: A structural equation modeling analysis,” Drvna Industrija, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 101–111, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.5552/drind.2018.1710.
N. Z. Sárga and R. Kása, “THE ROLE OF THE EMPLOYEE IN HUNGARIAN HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS,” European Journal of Mental Health, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 210–225, 2021, doi: 10.5708/EJMH.16.2021.2.11
Wright Evans Attipoe, George K. Agordzo, and Mr. John E. Seddoh, “Effect of Performance Appraisal System on Employee Productivity;(Selected Public Senior High Schools, Ho Municipality, Ghana),” Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.7176/jesd/12-2-01.
Sugijono, “PENILAIAN KINERJA DALAM MANAJEMEN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA.”
N. Dewi, R. H. Laluma, Gunawansyah, E. Garnia, D. Saepudin, and N. Hendajany, “Employee performance assessment system design based on 360 degrees feedback and simple multi-attribute rating technique method integration,” Proceeding of 14th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Services, and Applications, TSSA 2020, pp. 15–18, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TSSA51342.2020.9310873.
S. Abboud, “the Impact of 360 Degrees Performance,” The EUrASEANs: journal on global socio-economic dynamics, vol. 3, no. 28, 2021.
Copyright (c) 2023 Roni Habibi, Artha Glory Romey Manurung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Pernyataan Hak Cipta dan Lisensi
Dengan mengirimkan manuskrip ke Journal of Applied Computer Science and Technology (JACOST), penulis setuju dengan kebijakan ini. Tidak diperlukan persetujuan dokumen khusus.
- Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
- Penulis mempertahankan semua hak mereka atas karya yang diterbitkan, tak terbatas pada hak-hak yang diatur dalam laman ini.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa Journal of Applied Computer Science and Technology (JACOST) sebagai yang pertama kali mempublikasikan dengan lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-SA).
- Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain (misal: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dll), dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada Journal of Applied Computer Science and Technology (JACOST);
- Penulis menjamin bahwa artikel asli, ditulis oleh penulis yang disebutkan, belum pernah dipublikasikan sebelumnya, tidak mengandung pernyataan yang melanggar hukum, tidak melanggar hak orang lain, tunduk pada hak cipta yang secara eksklusif dipegang oleh penulis.
- Jika artikel dipersiapkan bersama oleh lebih dari satu penulis, setiap penulis yang mengirimkan naskah menjamin bahwa dia telah diberi wewenang oleh semua penulis bersama untuk menyetujui hak cipta dan pemberitahuan lisensi (perjanjian) atas nama mereka, dan setuju untuk memberi tahu rekan penulis persyaratan kebijakan ini. Journal of Applied Computer Science and Technology (JACOST) tidak akan dimintai pertanggungjawaban atas apa pun yang mungkin timbul karena perselisihan internal penulis.
Lisensi :
Journal of Applied Computer Science and Technology (JACOST) diterbitkan berdasarkan ketentuan Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-SA). Lisensi ini mengizinkan setiap orang untuk :.
- Berbagi — menyalin dan menyebarluaskan kembali materi ini dalam bentuk atau format apapun;
- Adaptasi — menggubah, mengubah, dan membuat turunan dari materi ini untuk kepentingan apapun.
Lisensi :
-
Atribusi — Anda harus mencantumkan nama yang sesuai, mencantumkan tautan terhadap lisensi, dan menyatakan bahwa telah ada perubahan yang dilakukan. Anda dapat melakukan hal ini dengan cara yang sesuai, namun tidak mengisyaratkan bahwa pemberi lisensi mendukung Anda atau penggunaan Anda.
-
BerbagiSerupa — Apabila Anda menggubah, mengubah, atau membuat turunan dari materi ini, Anda harus menyebarluaskan kontribusi Anda di bawah lisensi yang sama dengan materi asli.
